In the 1960's, Mr. G had worked as a lagger’s mate and an apprentice engineer at the Fawley Oil Refinery owned by Esso...
During that period he was exposed to asbestos. He suffered no other exposure during his life. in August 2007 Mr. G was diagnosed with Mesothelioma. He sadly passed away in December 2007 aged 60 and the claim was taken over by his widow, who along with their adult son had been completely financially dependent on him. Following his death she had needed to start working. The claim was successful and the Widow was awarded £316,000 in damages.
The award was high for the following reasons
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd admitted liability but disputed the amount of compensation to be awarded and the case therefore progressed to an assessment at the Royal Courts of Justice. The main arguments were in respect of the following:-
What age would the man have retired?
Before he became unwell, he had worked as a Project Engineer in Saudi Arabia for an oil company. He had lived with his wife Saudi Arabia for 20 years until their son left English boarding school in 2005, when she returned to the United Kingdom to care for her son whilst he started training.
Her husband had stayed in Saudi Arabia and continued to support their son financially, including funding his flat, transport and living expenses. He also paid for his wife's living expenses.
His wife had never worked and had not intended to ever do so. When he passed away he was earning £54,079 per annum and he had been provided with free accommodation, paid expenses and three free flights home each year.
His employer gave written evidence that whilst the retirement age in Saudi Arabia was 60, extensions could be granted for 1 – 2 year terms thereafter. An ex-employee of the Saudi Oil Company attended the trial and gave evidence that employment beyond 60 was not unusual. It was argued on behalf of his widow that he would have worked to 65 or perhaps longer. Although this was disputed by Esso, the Court was content that he would have worked until age 65.
Their son's dependency
Their son was aged 22 but was training as a sound engineer and not being paid and it was unclear when he would start to be paid.
It was ruled that a 25% self spend deduction should be applied because nowadays parents supported children in training much longer than they did in the past. Esso had argued for a 34% deduction on the basis that by the age of 22, their son should have been working. This decision changed the law in respect of the approach to dependency claims and at what age a non minor would be considered a 'dependent'.
Was an award for loss of a husband's love and affection appropriate in addition to the bereavement award?
The Court awarded £2k in respect of this, in addition to the statutory bereavement award of £10k.
The Court also awarded £16.5k for the DIY and maintenance that Mr S would have carried out in the future and the fact that having a man at home was more convenient that calling a tradesman.
Breakdown of General Damages: Pain, suffering and loss of amenity: £65,000; Regan v Williamson award: £2,000; Service costs: £16,500; Future dependency: £85,986; Pension dependency: £44,375.
Breakdown of Special Damages: Past care costs: £8,500; Past funeral expenses: £3,442; Past travel costs: £2,000; Bereavement £10,000; Cost of past comforts: £1,125; Past dependency for the period December 2007 until October 2009: £74,223; Interest: £3,750.